Bahamas vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Bahamas
78.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Central Europe and the Baltics
0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Bahamas rank
26th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
25th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
020406080197319902008

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 78.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 78.4 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 152.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 26th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 25th of 169 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Bahamas or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Bahamas, at 78.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 1995.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Bahamas and Central Europe and the Baltics?
78.4 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Central Europe and the Baltics?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1995.
How do Bahamas and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Bahamas ranks 26th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 25th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Bahamas vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.