Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ▼ Falling
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central Europe and the Baltics is 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2008. That is the lowest value across all 19 years on record.
The figure is down 50.0% on the previous year and down 93.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2008.
That places Central Europe and the Baltics 25th out of 47 groups with data for 2008, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 5.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1992 | 4.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1993 | 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 1994 | 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.0% |
| 1995 | 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1996 | 5.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1997 | 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1998 | 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.2% |
| 1999 | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2000 | 5.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2001 | 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2002 | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 6.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 2004 | 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 2005 | 0.9154 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.4% |
| 2006 | 0.5891 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 2007 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.4% |
| 2008 | 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 22 Comoros 107.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Lebanon 96.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Bahrain 95.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Cape Verde 84.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Bahamas 78.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Northern Mariana Islands 65.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Armenia 57.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central Europe and the Baltics was 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 25th out of 47 groups with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 93.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.