Cape Verde vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Cape Verde
84.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Central Europe and the Baltics
0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Cape Verde rank
25th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
25th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
0100200300400500197519912008

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 84.37 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 83.85 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 163.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 25th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 25th of 169 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 306.95 current US$ per square kilometre 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre 301.66 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 315.14 current US$ per square kilometre 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre 311.86 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Cape Verde or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Cape Verde, at 84.37 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5167 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics?
83.85 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics?
19 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2008.
How do Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Cape Verde ranks 25th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 25th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Cape Verde vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.