Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Brazil
0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
China
0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Brazil rank
163rd
China rank
161st

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Brazil
  • China
00.250.50.7511.2196919882008

How they compare

China currently reports 0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.048 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1979 it was China ahead.

Brazil ranks 163rd and China ranks 161st of 169 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil China Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1412 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1853 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0442 current US$ per square kilometre China
1980s 0.1883 current US$ per square kilometre 0.299 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1107 current US$ per square kilometre China
1990s 0.337 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6043 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2672 current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 0.4148 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6432 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2285 current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Brazil or China?
China, at 0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Brazil and China?
0.048 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
30 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2008.
How do Brazil and China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Brazil ranks 163rd and China ranks 161st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/china/">Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.