Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Brazil
Brazil: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Brazil, 1969–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in 2008.
The figure is down 59.4% on the previous year and down 26.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Brazil peaked at 0.688 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Brazil ranks 163rd of 169 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0.122 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.1364 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0945 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 1972 | 0.1065 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1973 | 0.1161 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1974 | 0.2776 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.2% |
| 1975 | 0.1531 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 1976 | 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1977 | 0.1244 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1978 | 0.1819 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.2% |
| 1979 | 0.1412 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1980 | 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.6% |
| 1981 | 0.1627 current US$ per square kilometre | +353.3% |
| 1982 | 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1983 | 0.1555 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1984 | 0.1579 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1985 | 0.2405 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.3% |
| 1986 | 0.268 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1987 | 0.2716 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1988 | 0.1962 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1989 | 0.2656 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.4% |
| 1990 | 0.2381 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1991 | 0.3063 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1992 | 0.3051 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1993 | 0.3613 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1994 | 0.262 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1995 | 0.688 current US$ per square kilometre | +162.6% |
| 1996 | 0.2393 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.2% |
| 1997 | 0.4152 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 1998 | 0.2501 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 1999 | 0.3051 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.3745 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.457 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2002 | 0.4535 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2003 | 0.4654 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2004 | 0.4941 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2005 | 0.4451 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2006 | 0.4092 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2007 | 0.4511 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2008 | 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.122 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.122 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.122 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 0.1461 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0945 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2776 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1883 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2716 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.337 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2381 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.688 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4148 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4941 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 160 Libya 0.233 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 161 China 0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 162 Oman 0.2262 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 164 Kazakhstan 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 165 India 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 166 Turkmenistan 0.0851 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Brazil?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Brazil was 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.688 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Brazil rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Brazil ranks 163rd out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.