Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ▲ Rising
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Kazakhstan, 1993–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Kazakhstan is 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2008.
The figure is down 71.2% on the previous year and down 62.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.4075 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
Kazakhstan ranks 164th of 169 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 16 years of available data.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1994 | 0.063 current US$ per square kilometre | +325.0% |
| 1995 | 0.1296 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.9% |
| 1996 | 0.1222 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1997 | 0.4075 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.3% |
| 1998 | 0.2926 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 1999 | 0.2445 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 2000 | 0.2889 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2001 | 0.3037 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2002 | 0.2852 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2003 | 0.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2004 | 0.2445 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 2005 | 0.3482 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 2006 | 0.3111 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2007 | 0.3852 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 2008 | 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.182 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4075 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2000s | 0.2865 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3852 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 161 China 0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 162 Oman 0.2262 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 163 Brazil 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 165 India 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 166 Turkmenistan 0.0851 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 167 Russian Federation 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Kazakhstan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 4.13 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4,730 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 105,758 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 203,116 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 14.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 4.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -27.89 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Kazakhstan?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Kazakhstan was 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4075 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Kazakhstan ranks 164th out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 62.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.