Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Russian Federation, 1992–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2004, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Russian Federation stood at 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.8% on the previous year and up 336.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Russian Federation peaked at 0.0854 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
That places Russian Federation 167th out of 169 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre | +1800.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1995 | 0.0299 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.8% |
| 1996 | 0.014 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0342 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.5% |
| 1998 | 0.033 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1999 | 0.0854 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0336 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0354 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0452 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 2003 | 0.0629 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0278 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0854 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0471 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0336 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0629 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 164 Kazakhstan 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 165 India 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 166 Turkmenistan 0.0851 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 168 Papua New Guinea 0.0442 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 169 Somalia 0.0159 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Russian Federation
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 22.99 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 90,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.20 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 160.07 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 12.15 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 98.31 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.89 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.91 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.82 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Russian Federation?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Russian Federation was 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0854 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Russian Federation rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Russian Federation ranks 167th out of 169 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is up 336.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.