China vs Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

China
0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Kazakhstan
0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
China rank
161st
Kazakhstan rank
164th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • China
  • Kazakhstan
00.250.50.7511.2197919932008

How they compare

China currently reports 0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.12 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 2.1 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 161st and Kazakhstan ranks 164th of 169 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6303 current US$ per square kilometre 0.182 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4482 current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 0.6432 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2865 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3568 current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, China or Kazakhstan?
China, at 0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between China and Kazakhstan?
0.12 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
16 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2008.
How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
China ranks 161st and Kazakhstan ranks 164th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/kazakhstan/">China vs Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.