Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Brazil
0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Kazakhstan
0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Brazil rank
163rd
Kazakhstan rank
164th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Brazil
  • Kazakhstan
00.20.40.6196919882008

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.072 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.6 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 163rd and Kazakhstan ranks 164th of 169 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3601 current US$ per square kilometre 0.182 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1781 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.4148 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2865 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1283 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Brazil or Kazakhstan?
Brazil, at 0.1831 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1111 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Brazil and Kazakhstan?
0.072 current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kazakhstan?
16 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2008.
How do Brazil and Kazakhstan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Brazil ranks 163rd and Kazakhstan ranks 164th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/kazakhstan/">Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.