Chad vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Chad
0.3971 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
South Africa
0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Chad rank
153rd
South Africa rank
154th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Chad
  • South Africa
0123196919882008

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.3971 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0014 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 153rd and South Africa ranks 154th of 169 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1503 current US$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4078 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Chad or South Africa?
Chad, at 0.3971 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Chad and South Africa?
0.0014 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Africa?
15 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2008.
How do Chad and South Africa rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Chad ranks 153rd and South Africa ranks 154th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/south-africa/">Chad vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.