Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in South Africa
South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in South Africa, 1994–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2008, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in South Africa stood at 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 83.4% on the previous year and down 66.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in South Africa peaked at 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.2061 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1994.
South Africa ranks 154th of 169 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in South Africa, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 0.2061 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1995 | 0.5441 current US$ per square kilometre | +164.0% |
| 1996 | 0.5688 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +181.2% |
| 1998 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1999 | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.6% |
| 2000 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2001 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2002 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2003 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2004 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2005 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2006 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.4% |
| 2007 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.0% |
| 2008 | 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2061 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 2000s | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
- 151 Mexico 0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 152 Congo 0.4392 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 153 Chad 0.3971 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 155 Algeria 0.3821 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 156 Argentina 0.3691 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 157 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.3438 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Africa
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 789,470 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 7.80 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 66.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 80.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 314.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 111.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 18.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 6.66 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in South Africa?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in South Africa was 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2061 current US$ per square kilometre in 1994.
- How does South Africa rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- South Africa ranks 154th out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is down 66.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.