Congo vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Congo
0.4392 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
South Africa
0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Congo rank
152nd
South Africa rank
154th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • South Africa
02.557.51012.5196919882008

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.4392 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0435 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 152nd and South Africa ranks 154th of 169 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Congo or South Africa?
Congo, at 0.4392 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3957 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Congo and South Africa?
0.0435 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
15 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2008.
How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Congo ranks 152nd and South Africa ranks 154th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/south-africa/">Congo vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.