Chile vs New Caledonia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Chile
1.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
New Caledonia
1.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Chile rank
125th
New Caledonia rank
128th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • New Caledonia
01234196919882008

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 128th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5918 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8206 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2288 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9573 current US$ per square kilometre 0.391 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5466 current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Chile or New Caledonia?
Chile, at 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Chile and New Caledonia?
0.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?
10 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 1999.
How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Chile ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 128th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Caledonia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/new-caledonia/">Chile vs New Caledonia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.