Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Chile
Chile: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Chile, 1969–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2008, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Chile stood at 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 36.5% on the previous year and down 39.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Chile peaked at 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.2152 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Chile ranks 125th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0.2555 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.3362 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1971 | 0.3093 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1972 | 0.269 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1973 | 0.3497 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1974 | 0.6321 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.8% |
| 1975 | 0.2824 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.3% |
| 1976 | 0.3497 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1977 | 0.5918 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.2% |
| 1978 | 0.6187 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1979 | 0.5649 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1980 | 0.2152 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.9% |
| 1981 | 0.7935 current US$ per square kilometre | +268.8% |
| 1982 | 0.9415 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1983 | 0.7666 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1984 | 0.6321 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1985 | 0.9952 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.4% |
| 1986 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1987 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.5% |
| 1988 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.0% |
| 1989 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.1% |
| 1990 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1991 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1992 | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1993 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1994 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1995 | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.2% |
| 1996 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 1997 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1998 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1999 | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2000 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2001 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2002 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2003 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.3% |
| 2004 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2005 | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 2006 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 2007 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2008 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2555 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2555 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2555 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 0.4304 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.269 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6321 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9831 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2152 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 122 Egypt 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Zimbabwe 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 124 Gabon 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 126 Paraguay 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 Tanzania, United Republic of 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 128 New Caledonia 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Chile?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Chile was 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2152 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Chile rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Chile ranks 125th out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 39.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.