Chile vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square
Chile
1.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Zimbabwe
1.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Chile rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
123rd
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time
- Chile
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.14 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 169 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.269 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2173 current US$ per square kilometre | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.9831 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Chile or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 0.14 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2008.
- How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Chile ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.