Cuba vs North Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Cuba
12.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
North Korea
11.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Cuba rank
56th
North Korea rank
57th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Cuba
  • North Korea
0102030196919882008

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 0.91 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times North Korea's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1985 it was North Korea ahead.

Cuba ranks 56th and North Korea ranks 57th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and North Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba North Korea Difference Ahead
1980s 10.67 current US$ per square kilometre 10.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5882 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 18.62 current US$ per square kilometre 17.16 current US$ per square kilometre 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 14.67 current US$ per square kilometre 19.86 current US$ per square kilometre 5.19 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Cuba or North Korea?
Cuba, at 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Cuba and North Korea?
0.91 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Korea?
24 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2008.
How do Cuba and North Korea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 56th and North Korea ranks 57th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs North Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Cuba vs North Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.