Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Cuba
Cuba: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Cuba, 1969–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in 2008.
That represents a change of down 31.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Cuba peaked at 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1969.
Cuba ranks 56th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.7% |
| 1971 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1972 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.1% |
| 1973 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1975 | 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 1976 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 1977 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1978 | 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.7% |
| 1979 | 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1980 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 1981 | 13.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +429.6% |
| 1982 | 9.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 1983 | 9.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1984 | 8.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 1985 | 6.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1986 | 10.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.6% |
| 1987 | 10.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1988 | 12.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1989 | 13.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1990 | 12.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1991 | 17.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 1992 | 16.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1993 | 18.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1994 | 17.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1995 | 20.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1996 | 14.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1997 | 23 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.4% |
| 1998 | 18.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 1999 | 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.1% |
| 2000 | 15.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.9% |
| 2001 | 15.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2002 | 15.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2003 | 17.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2004 | 11.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 2005 | 16.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 2006 | 14.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2007 | 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2008 | 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 53 Republic of Korea 14.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 54 Costa Rica 14.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 55 Belize 13.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 57 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Trinidad and Tobago 11.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 59 Nicaragua 11.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Cuba
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,165 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 582,429 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 18.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 550,653 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.00 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Cuba?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Cuba was 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969.
- How does Cuba rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Cuba ranks 56th out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.