Cuba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Cuba
12.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Trinidad and Tobago
11.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Cuba rank
56th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
58th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050100150200250196919882008

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Cuba ranks 56th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 58th of 169 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre 12.53 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre 22.61 current US$ per square kilometre 19.22 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 10.4 current US$ per square kilometre 87.29 current US$ per square kilometre 76.89 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 18.62 current US$ per square kilometre 142.3 current US$ per square kilometre 123.68 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 14.67 current US$ per square kilometre 98.77 current US$ per square kilometre 84.1 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Cuba or Trinidad and Tobago?
Cuba, at 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago?
39 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2008.
How do Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 56th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 58th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/trinidad-and-tobago/">Cuba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.