Cuba vs Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Cuba
12.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Korea
14.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Cuba rank
56th
Korea rank
53rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Cuba
  • Korea
0102030196919882008

How they compare

Korea currently reports 14.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Korea ahead.

Cuba ranks 56th and Korea ranks 53rd of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1970s 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1980s 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre 11.87 current US$ per square kilometre 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1990s 18.62 current US$ per square kilometre 15.44 current US$ per square kilometre 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Cuba or Korea?
Korea, at 14.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Cuba and Korea?
1.75 current US$ per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Korea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1999.
How do Cuba and Korea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 56th and Korea ranks 53rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/korea-rep/">Cuba vs Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.