Ecuador vs Kenya: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Ecuador
3.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Kenya
3.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Ecuador rank
104th
Kenya rank
103rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kenya
0246810196919882008

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.19 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 104th and Kenya ranks 103rd of 169 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9753 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5623 current US$ per square kilometre 0.413 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8574 current US$ per square kilometre 0.443 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 6.64 current US$ per square kilometre 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Ecuador or Kenya?
Kenya, at 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Ecuador and Kenya?
0.19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
40 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2008.
How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 104th and Kenya ranks 103rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kenya: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kenya/">Ecuador vs Kenya: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.