Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Ecuador, 1969–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2008, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Ecuador stood at 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 60.1% on the previous year and down 54.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Ecuador peaked at 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0.7224 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Ecuador ranks 104th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0.9753 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.8308 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1971 | 0.7224 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1972 | 0.903 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1973 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1974 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.9% |
| 1975 | 0.9392 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 1976 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.4% |
| 1977 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1978 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1979 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.1% |
| 1980 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1981 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +170.0% |
| 1982 | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1983 | 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1984 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1985 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 1986 | 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1987 | 5.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.1% |
| 1988 | 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1989 | 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1990 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1991 | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1992 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1993 | 8.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1994 | 5.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 1995 | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 1996 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.2% |
| 1997 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1998 | 6.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1999 | 7.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2000 | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2001 | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.8% |
| 2002 | 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +123.4% |
| 2003 | 6.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 2004 | 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2005 | 9.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2006 | 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2007 | 7.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2008 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9753 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9753 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9753 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7224 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 101 Côte d'Ivoire 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 102 Uruguay 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 103 Kenya 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Romania 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 106 Lao People's Democratic Republic 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Philippines 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Ecuador?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Ecuador was 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.7224 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Ecuador rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Ecuador ranks 104th out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 54.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.