Ecuador vs Romania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Ecuador
3.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Romania
2.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Ecuador rank
104th
Romania rank
105th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Romania
0246810196919882008

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.23 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 104th and Romania ranks 105th of 169 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 6.64 current US$ per square kilometre 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Ecuador or Romania?
Ecuador, at 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Romania as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Ecuador and Romania?
0.23 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 104th and Romania ranks 105th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Romania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/">Ecuador vs Romania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.