Georgia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Georgia
10.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Turks and Caicos Islands
10.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Georgia rank
62nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
64th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Georgia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
010203040198419962008

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Georgia ranks 62nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 169 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 6.84 current US$ per square kilometre 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 13.84 current US$ per square kilometre 24.56 current US$ per square kilometre 10.72 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Georgia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Georgia, at 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Georgia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2007.
How do Georgia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Georgia ranks 62nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Georgia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.