Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Turks and Caicos Islands
Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Turks and Caicos Islands, 1984–2007
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Turks and Caicos Islands recorded 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in 2007. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Turks and Caicos Islands peaked at 42.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000 and was at its lowest, 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1989.
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Turks and Caicos Islands, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 21.05 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1997 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 42.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2001 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 2002 | 42.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2003 | 31.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2005 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2007 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 15.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1990s | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 2000s | 24.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
Countries ranked near Turks and Caicos Islands
- 61 French Polynesia 10.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 62 Georgia 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 63 Malawi 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Slovenia 10.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 66 Croatia 10.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Vanuatu 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Turks and Caicos Islands
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.16 million current US$ (2007)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 11.88 million current US$ (2007)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 480,000 current US$ (2007)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 14.52 million current US$ (2007)
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP 440,000 current US$ (2002)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 15.39 million current US$ (2007)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 16.47 million constant 2023 US$ (2007)
- Net official development assistance received 15.39 million current US$ (2007)
- Net official development assistance received 16.47 million constant 2023 US$ (2007)
- Net ODA received per capita 585.84 current US$ (2007)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Turks and Caicos Islands was 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 42.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does Turks and Caicos Islands rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th out of 169 countries with data for 2007.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Turks and Caicos Islands data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.