Malawi vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Malawi
10.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Turks and Caicos Islands
10.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Malawi rank
63rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
64th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Malawi
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
010203040196919882008

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.08 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Malawi ranks 63rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 7.58 current US$ per square kilometre 15.79 current US$ per square kilometre 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 20.31 current US$ per square kilometre 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre 9.79 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 20.95 current US$ per square kilometre 24.56 current US$ per square kilometre 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Malawi or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Malawi, at 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Malawi and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.08 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Turks and Caicos Islands?
10 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2007.
How do Malawi and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Malawi ranks 63rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Malawi vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.