Slovenia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Slovenia
10.43 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Turks and Caicos Islands
10.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Slovenia rank
65th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
64th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Slovenia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
10203040198419952007

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.1 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 65th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 169 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 17.13 current US$ per square kilometre 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre 6.6 current US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 15.39 current US$ per square kilometre 31.58 current US$ per square kilometre 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Slovenia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2007.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Slovenia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.1 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2002.
How do Slovenia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Slovenia ranks 65th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Slovenia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.