Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Malta: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Malta
812.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
10th
Malta rank
9th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Malta
02004006008001.0k196919882008

How they compare

Malta currently reports 812.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 810.77 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 469.2 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th and Malta ranks 9th of 47 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 0.9207 current US$ per square kilometre 90.62 current US$ per square kilometre 89.7 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre 265.62 current US$ per square kilometre 263.41 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre 503.12 current US$ per square kilometre 499.4 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre 604.17 current US$ per square kilometre 599.54 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Malta?
Malta, at 812.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2002.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Malta?
810.77 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Malta?
33 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2002.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Malta rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th and Malta ranks 9th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Malta: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/malta/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Malta: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.