Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1970–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) recorded 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in 2008.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 65.6% on the previous year and down 42.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.4805 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
That places Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) 10th out of 47 groups with data for 2008, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.54 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.5966 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1972 | 0.6807 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1973 | 0.6844 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1974 | 0.7797 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1975 | 0.811 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1976 | 0.9732 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1977 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1978 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1979 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1980 | 0.4805 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.4% |
| 1981 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +264.7% |
| 1982 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1983 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.1% |
| 1984 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1985 | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.3% |
| 1986 | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1987 | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1988 | 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 1989 | 3.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.8% |
| 1990 | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1991 | 3.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1992 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1993 | 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.1% |
| 1994 | 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1995 | 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.7% |
| 1996 | 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.0% |
| 1997 | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.3% |
| 1998 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 1999 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.4% |
| 2000 | 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2001 | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.0% |
| 2002 | 5.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.7% |
| 2003 | 5.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2004 | 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2005 | 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2006 | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 2007 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 2008 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.9207 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4805 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 7 Seychelles 956.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Singapore 865.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Malta 812.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Antigua and Barbuda 681.82 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Barbados 581.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Marshall Islands 444.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Tonga 375 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4805 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th out of 47 groups with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.