Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Dominican Republic
19.56 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
16.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300196919962023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 19.56 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 123 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s 10.28 current US$ per square kilometre 32.26 current US$ per square kilometre 21.98 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 11.8 current US$ per square kilometre 50.85 current US$ per square kilometre 39.05 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre 9 current US$ per square kilometre 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 10.69 current US$ per square kilometre 23.35 current US$ per square kilometre 12.66 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Dominican Republic or Zimbabwe?
Dominican Republic, at 19.56 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
3.29 current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Dominican Republic ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/zimbabwe/">Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.