Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square was 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square in Zimbabwe, 1981–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square in Zimbabwe stood at 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 19.6% on the previous year and down 67.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square in Zimbabwe peaked at 324.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, -6.31 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2004.
Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 123 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0.7755 current US$ per square kilometre | +275.0% |
| 1983 | 4.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +520.0% |
| 1984 | 13.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +185.5% |
| 1986 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.3% |
| 1987 | 6.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +238.4% |
| 1988 | 12.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.9% |
| 1989 | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 1990 | 8.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.8% |
| 1991 | 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 1992 | 152.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +1311.5% |
| 1993 | 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.2% |
| 1994 | 11.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1995 | -3.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -132.7% |
| 2001 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -186.1% |
| 2002 | 10.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +234.7% |
| 2003 | 12.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2004 | -6.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -149.8% |
| 2005 | 324.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -5240.2% |
| 2006 | 21.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.4% |
| 2007 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.3% |
| 2008 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2009 | 9.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +536.7% |
| 2010 | 8.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2011 | 12.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.4% |
| 2012 | 32.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +160.7% |
| 2013 | 49.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 2014 | 36.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 2015 | 6.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.6% |
| 2016 | 40.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +566.5% |
| 2017 | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.5% |
| 2018 | 9 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2019 | 27.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +203.0% |
| 2020 | 34.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 2021 | 33.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2022 | 20.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.6% |
| 2023 | 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1990s | 32.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 152.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 2000s | 42.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 324.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 23.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 26.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 43 Dominican Republic 19.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Honduras 17.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Ethiopia 17.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Guatemala 16.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Iraq 15.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Singapore 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square in Zimbabwe?
- Net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square in Zimbabwe was 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 324.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was -6.31 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
- Zimbabwe ranks 46th out of 123 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 67.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 37 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.