Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Guatemala
16.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
16.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300197119972023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.04 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 123 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 56.73 current US$ per square kilometre 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre 51.06 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 86.27 current US$ per square kilometre 32.26 current US$ per square kilometre 54.01 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 23.21 current US$ per square kilometre 42.12 current US$ per square kilometre 18.92 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 17.43 current US$ per square kilometre 23.18 current US$ per square kilometre 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 27.64 current US$ per square kilometre 26.08 current US$ per square kilometre 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
0.04 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/zimbabwe/">Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.