Euro area vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Euro area
0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
Zimbabwe
16.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Euro area
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 16.25 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 769.0 times Euro area's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Euro area ahead.

Euro area ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 46 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.4936 current US$ per square kilometre 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s -0.0398 current US$ per square kilometre 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre 10.87 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre 12.67 current US$ per square kilometre 12.65 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Euro area or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Euro area and Zimbabwe?
16.25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2003.
How do Euro area and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Euro area ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/zimbabwe/">Euro area vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.