European Union vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

European Union
0.0151 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
Zimbabwe
16.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
European Union rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • European Union
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0151 current US$ per square kilometre in European Union, a difference of 16.25 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1,081.0 times European Union's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1981 it was European Union ahead.

European Union ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 46 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.3458 current US$ per square kilometre 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre 6.05 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0151 current US$ per square kilometre 12.67 current US$ per square kilometre 12.65 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, European Union or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0151 current US$ per square kilometre in European Union as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between European Union and Zimbabwe?
16.25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Zimbabwe?
11 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2003.
How do European Union and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
European Union ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/zimbabwe/">European Union vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.