Barbados vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of

Barbados
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2008
China
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2005
Barbados rank
96th
China rank
97th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of over time

  • Barbados
  • China
00.0010.0010.002196919882008

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 96th and China ranks 97th of 122 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
1980s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of, Barbados or China?
Barbados, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in China as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of between Barbados and China?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
8 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 1986.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of?
Barbados ranks 96th and China ranks 97th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 6,581 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.