Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of in Barbados
Barbados: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of in Barbados, 1969–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2008, net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of in Barbados stood at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 34.9% on the previous year.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of in Barbados peaked at 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1975 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
That places Barbados 96th out of 122 countries with data for 2008, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of in Barbados, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1970 | 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -23.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +38.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.4% |
| 1973 | 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -49.9% |
| 1974 | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +59.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +147.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -29.8% |
| 1977 | 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -32.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -19.6% |
| 1979 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -45.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -28.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -63.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +129.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -41.1% |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -63.3% |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +11.5% |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -48.0% |
| 2006 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +56.0% |
| 2007 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -84.1% |
| 2008 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -34.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1 |
| 1970s | 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 7 |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 3 |
Countries ranked near Barbados
- 93 Gabon 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 94 Cambodia 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 95 Cape Verde 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 97 China 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 98 Costa Rica 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 99 Russian Federation 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More aid effectiveness data for Barbados
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 20,000 current US$ (1997)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 640,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 12.35 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 80,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway -10,000 current US$ (2001)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 14.80 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of in Barbados?
- Net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of in Barbados was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of recorded in Barbados?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1975.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of recorded in Barbados?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Barbados rank for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of?
- Barbados ranks 96th out of 122 countries with data for 2008.
- Where does this Barbados data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.