Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Lithuania
Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) was 60,000 current US$ in 1996. ▲ Rising
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Lithuania, 1992–1996
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Lithuania is 60,000 current US$, measured in 1996.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 25.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over five years.
Lithuania ranks 97th of 164 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 30,000 current US$ | — |
| 1993 | 50,000 current US$ | +66.7% |
| 1994 | 20,000 current US$ | -60.0% |
| 1995 | 80,000 current US$ | +300.0% |
| 1996 | 60,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 95 Nicaragua 65,795 current US$ compare
- 96 Antigua and Barbuda 60,568 current US$ compare
- 98 Guinea-Bissau 58,239 current US$
- 99 Iran, Islamic Republic of 55,709 current US$ compare
- 100 Mali 54,773 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Lithuania
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 200,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 420,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 280,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 217.86 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 60,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 9.75 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.74 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 100,000 current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -3.32 million current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.16 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Lithuania?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Lithuania was 60,000 current US$ in 1996, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 80,000 current US$ in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 20,000 current US$ in 1994.
- How does Lithuania rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Lithuania ranks 97th out of 164 countries with data for 1996.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.