Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 0.5913 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia recorded 0.5913 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 65.4% on the previous year and up 647.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 38th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0146 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0219 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0128 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 1979 | 0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | +550.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0073 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 1981 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0292 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0128 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0073 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.0164 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0402 current US$ per square kilometre | +633.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0089 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0364 current US$ per square kilometre | +310.7% |
| 1994 | 0.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 1995 | 0.1109 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.1% |
| 1996 | 0.1345 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1997 | 0.0491 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.5% |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1999 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000 | 0.2199 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0322 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0106 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0146 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.6% |
| 2006 | 0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0383 current US$ per square kilometre | +556.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.5% |
| 2009 | 0.0036 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.8% |
| 2010 | 0.0405 current US$ per square kilometre | +1009.9% |
| 2011 | 0.016 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.4% |
| 2012 | 0.1743 current US$ per square kilometre | +986.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0791 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.6% |
| 2014 | 0.004 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0241 current US$ per square kilometre | +500.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0334 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0457 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 2018 | 0.0253 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2020 | 0.1777 current US$ per square kilometre | +736.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0106 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.0% |
| 2022 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +16003.3% |
| 2023 | 0.5913 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0004 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.0106 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0086 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0292 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2293 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0036 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2199 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0464 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.004 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1743 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6221 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0106 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 35 Bhutan 82.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Malta 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Burundi 60.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Singapore 59.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Syria 51.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Sao Tome and Principe 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 48.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia was 0.5913 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 38th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 647.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.