Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in European Union
European Union: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in European Union, 1972–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
European Union recorded 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in 2010. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
The figure is down 99.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in European Union peaked at 0.5767 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2010.
That places European Union 46th out of 46 groups with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in European Union, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 0.0028 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0.0223 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1975 | 0.039 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0195 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0084 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1978 | 0.0084 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0056 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1980 | 0.2398 current US$ per square kilometre | +4200.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0753 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.6% |
| 1982 | 0.0502 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0837 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0279 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1985 | 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0028 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0084 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.1% |
| 1990 | 0.0112 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1991 | 0.1311 current US$ per square kilometre | +1075.0% |
| 1992 | 0.3004 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.1% |
| 1993 | 0.3035 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0582 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.8% |
| 1995 | 0.2883 current US$ per square kilometre | +395.7% |
| 1996 | 0.5767 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0126 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.8% |
| 1999 | 0.5109 current US$ per square kilometre | +3940.1% |
| 2000 | 0.2683 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 2001 | 0.3261 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 2002 | 0.4566 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 2003 | 0.2509 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.1% |
| 2004 | 0.5218 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.0% |
| 2007 | 0.2083 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.1% |
| 2008 | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0151 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0028 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.039 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1980s | 0.0579 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0028 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2398 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 0.2437 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0112 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5767 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 0.2546 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5218 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2010s | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near European Union
- 43 Jordan 44.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 North Korea 37.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 New Caledonia 35.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Afghanistan 33.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Brunei Darussalam 30.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Thailand 28.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Malawi 25.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for European Union
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in European Union?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in European Union was 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in European Union?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5767 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in European Union?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- How does European Union rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- European Union ranks 46th out of 46 groups with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in European Union?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this European Union data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.