Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 0.048 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) stood at 0.048 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 18.9% on the previous year and down 97.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 41st of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0027 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0053 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1975 | 0.0069 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0128 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.6% |
| 1977 | 0.0165 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1978 | 0.0266 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 1979 | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0213 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0149 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0298 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0803 current US$ per square kilometre | +169.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0585 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0909 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.5% |
| 1986 | 0.1058 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0356 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.3% |
| 1988 | 0.0622 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0479 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1990 | 0.0282 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0356 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1992 | 0.0308 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0564 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.8% |
| 1994 | 0.0505 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1995 | 0.017 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0245 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0655 current US$ per square kilometre | +186.5% |
| 1999 | 0.0293 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0495 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0272 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.2% |
| 2002 | 0.0197 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0778 current US$ per square kilometre | +294.6% |
| 2004 | 0.3078 current US$ per square kilometre | +295.9% |
| 2005 | 0.1033 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0831 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 2007 | 0.106 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0671 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 2009 | 0.065 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2010 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +2743.4% |
| 2011 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2012 | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 2013 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 2014 | 0.8484 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.4% |
| 2015 | 0.5925 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 2016 | 0.4124 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 2017 | 0.6379 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.7% |
| 2018 | 0.2014 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.4% |
| 2019 | 0.2105 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2020 | 0.1327 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.0% |
| 2021 | 0.1176 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.7% |
| 2023 | 0.048 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.0105 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0266 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0547 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0149 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1058 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0361 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.017 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0655 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0906 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0197 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3078 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2014 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0846 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1327 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 38 Singapore 59.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Syrian Arab Republic 51.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Sao Tome and Principe 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 48.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Dominica 44.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Jordan 44.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 37.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 0.048 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 41st out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 97.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.