Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) in Brazil

Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) was 33.53 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
33.53 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 591.3%
World rank
52nd
of 147 countries
All-time high
460 % change on previous year
in 1987
All-time low
-766.67 % change on previous year
in 1966
Years of data
54
1965–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) in Brazil, 1965–2023

-750-500-2500250500196519942023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$) in Brazil stood at 33.53 % change on previous year.

The figure is up 591.3% on the previous year and up 676.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$) in Brazil peaked at 460 % change on previous year in 1987 and was at its lowest, -766.67 % change on previous year, in 1966.

Brazil ranks 52nd of 147 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), annual growth rate in Brazil, 1965 to 2023.
Year % change on previous year Change
1965 200 % change on previous year
1966 -766.67 % change on previous year -483.3%
1967 230 % change on previous year -130.0%
1968 -84.62 % change on previous year -136.8%
1969 -50 % change on previous year -40.9%
1971 -95.08 % change on previous year +90.2%
1972 66.67 % change on previous year -170.1%
1973 -80 % change on previous year -220.0%
1978 1.47 % change on previous year -101.8%
1979 55.07 % change on previous year +3644.9%
1980 30.84 % change on previous year -44.0%
1981 -74.29 % change on previous year -340.9%
1982 22.22 % change on previous year -129.9%
1983 -31.82 % change on previous year -243.2%
1984 -40 % change on previous year +25.7%
1985 -55.56 % change on previous year +38.9%
1986 25 % change on previous year -145.0%
1987 460 % change on previous year +1740.0%
1988 -28.57 % change on previous year -106.2%
1989 105 % change on previous year -467.5%
1990 34.15 % change on previous year -67.5%
1991 28.18 % change on previous year -17.5%
1992 26.95 % change on previous year -4.4%
1993 136.87 % change on previous year +407.9%
1994 -41.51 % change on previous year -130.3%
1995 13.31 % change on previous year -132.1%
1996 -6.76 % change on previous year -150.8%
1997 -15.27 % change on previous year +125.8%
1998 -9.46 % change on previous year -38.0%
1999 1.49 % change on previous year -115.8%
2000 -15.2 % change on previous year -1118.1%
2001 10.4 % change on previous year -168.5%
2002 -4.71 % change on previous year -145.3%
2003 -14.29 % change on previous year +203.2%
2004 5.77 % change on previous year -140.4%
2005 20.61 % change on previous year +257.2%
2006 39.2 % change on previous year +90.2%
2007 5.78 % change on previous year -85.3%
2008 7.85 % change on previous year +35.9%
2009 -20.57 % change on previous year -362.0%
2010 -21.91 % change on previous year +6.5%
2011 -18.88 % change on previous year -13.8%
2012 -15.89 % change on previous year -15.8%
2013 4.32 % change on previous year -127.2%
2014 13.35 % change on previous year +209.0%
2015 1.97 % change on previous year -85.2%
2016 5.38 % change on previous year +173.1%
2017 32.06 % change on previous year +495.4%
2018 9.05 % change on previous year -71.8%
2019 -15.34 % change on previous year -269.6%
2020 15.23 % change on previous year -199.3%
2021 22.01 % change on previous year +44.5%
2022 -6.83 % change on previous year -131.0%
2023 33.53 % change on previous year -591.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s -94.26 % change on previous year -766.67 % change on previous year 230 % change on previous year 5
1970s -10.37 % change on previous year -95.08 % change on previous year 66.67 % change on previous year 5
1980s 41.28 % change on previous year -74.29 % change on previous year 460 % change on previous year 10
1990s 16.8 % change on previous year -41.51 % change on previous year 136.87 % change on previous year 10
2000s 3.48 % change on previous year -20.57 % change on previous year 39.2 % change on previous year 10
2010s -0.5886 % change on previous year -21.91 % change on previous year 32.06 % change on previous year 10
2020s 15.99 % change on previous year -6.83 % change on previous year 33.53 % change on previous year 4

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 49 Sao Tome and Principe 35.36 % change on previous year compare
  2. 50 Thailand 34.69 % change on previous year compare
  3. 51 Republic of Moldova 33.84 % change on previous year compare
  4. 53 Morocco 32.96 % change on previous year compare
  5. 54 Kyrgyzstan 32.79 % change on previous year compare
  6. 55 Iraq 32.53 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 193 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$) in Brazil?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$) in Brazil was 33.53 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$) recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 460 % change on previous year in 1987.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$) recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was -766.67 % change on previous year in 1966.
How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$)?
Brazil ranks 52nd out of 147 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$) rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 676.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-annual-growth-rate/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-annual-growth-rate/brazil/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 7,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.