Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
3.92 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.7%
Rank
26th
of 44 groups
All-time high
14.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low income stood at 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 2.7% on the previous year and up 45.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low income peaked at 14.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Low income 26th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0265 current US$ per square kilometre | +2800.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0082 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.0% |
| 1965 | 0.138 current US$ per square kilometre | +1577.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0685 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.3% |
| 1967 | 0.1471 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.7% |
| 1968 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0832 current US$ per square kilometre | +9000.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0923 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0228 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.2% |
| 1973 | 0.042 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.0% |
| 1974 | 0.234 current US$ per square kilometre | +456.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0448 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0731 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.3% |
| 1977 | 0.2002 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.8% |
| 1978 | 0.2843 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.0% |
| 1979 | 0.2221 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1980 | 0.2075 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1981 | 0.5557 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.8% |
| 1982 | 0.4332 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.0% |
| 1983 | 0.2422 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 1984 | 0.5804 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.6% |
| 1985 | 0.5073 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1986 | 0.4716 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1987 | 0.8382 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.7% |
| 1988 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.4% |
| 1989 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.6% |
| 1990 | 4.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.3% |
| 1991 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1992 | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.4% |
| 1993 | 3.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1994 | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1995 | 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1996 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1997 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 1998 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1999 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 2000 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 2001 | 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2002 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.9% |
| 2003 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 2004 | 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2005 | 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.3% |
| 2006 | 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.8% |
| 2007 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2008 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +137.4% |
| 2009 | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2010 | 14.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.8% |
| 2011 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.4% |
| 2012 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.3% |
| 2013 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2014 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2015 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 2016 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.6% |
| 2017 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.1% |
| 2018 | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2019 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 2020 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2021 | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 2022 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 2023 | 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0436 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1471 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1299 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0228 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2843 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.7771 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2075 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 23 Hong Kong, China 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Seychelles 65.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Jordan 54.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Guatemala 48.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Cyprus 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Türkiye 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Grenada 38.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low income was 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 14.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Low income ranks 26th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 45.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.