Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries
Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps was 410.90 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries is 410.90 million current US$, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 13.8% on the previous year and down 7.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries peaked at 1.08 billion current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, 72.57 million current US$, in 1970.
Least developed countries ranks 10th of 44 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 72.57 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 80.84 million current US$ | +11.4% |
| 1972 | 102.18 million current US$ | +26.4% |
| 1973 | 121.29 million current US$ | +18.7% |
| 1974 | 143.29 million current US$ | +18.1% |
| 1975 | 168.17 million current US$ | +17.4% |
| 1976 | 151.19 million current US$ | -10.1% |
| 1977 | 172.69 million current US$ | +14.2% |
| 1978 | 210.95 million current US$ | +22.2% |
| 1979 | 269.40 million current US$ | +27.7% |
| 1980 | 276.64 million current US$ | +2.7% |
| 1981 | 219.34 million current US$ | -20.7% |
| 1982 | 184.09 million current US$ | -16.1% |
| 1983 | 150.96 million current US$ | -18.0% |
| 1984 | 139.45 million current US$ | -7.6% |
| 1985 | 177.60 million current US$ | +27.4% |
| 1986 | 233.29 million current US$ | +31.4% |
| 1987 | 229.94 million current US$ | -1.4% |
| 1988 | 233.83 million current US$ | +1.7% |
| 1989 | 179.85 million current US$ | -23.1% |
| 1990 | 269.78 million current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1991 | 167.48 million current US$ | -37.9% |
| 1992 | 215.16 million current US$ | +28.5% |
| 1993 | 173.83 million current US$ | -19.2% |
| 1994 | 171.93 million current US$ | -1.1% |
| 1995 | 154.10 million current US$ | -10.4% |
| 1996 | 163.00 million current US$ | +5.8% |
| 1997 | 167.78 million current US$ | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 191.89 million current US$ | +14.4% |
| 1999 | 129.86 million current US$ | -32.3% |
| 2000 | 153.45 million current US$ | +18.2% |
| 2001 | 187.41 million current US$ | +22.1% |
| 2002 | 252.13 million current US$ | +34.5% |
| 2003 | 959.22 million current US$ | +280.4% |
| 2004 | 457.25 million current US$ | -52.3% |
| 2005 | 349.45 million current US$ | -23.6% |
| 2006 | 478.96 million current US$ | +37.1% |
| 2007 | 492.34 million current US$ | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 540.80 million current US$ | +9.8% |
| 2009 | 613.74 million current US$ | +13.5% |
| 2010 | 1.08 billion current US$ | +76.5% |
| 2011 | 723.25 million current US$ | -33.3% |
| 2012 | 444.22 million current US$ | -38.6% |
| 2013 | 495.83 million current US$ | +11.6% |
| 2014 | 474.25 million current US$ | -4.4% |
| 2015 | 377.37 million current US$ | -20.4% |
| 2016 | 398.10 million current US$ | +5.5% |
| 2017 | 401.66 million current US$ | +0.9% |
| 2018 | 421.81 million current US$ | +5.0% |
| 2019 | 382.45 million current US$ | -9.3% |
| 2020 | 415.74 million current US$ | +8.7% |
| 2021 | 476.84 million current US$ | +14.7% |
| 2022 | 410.90 million current US$ | -13.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 149.26 million current US$ | 72.57 million current US$ | 269.40 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 202.50 million current US$ | 139.45 million current US$ | 276.64 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 180.48 million current US$ | 129.86 million current US$ | 269.78 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 448.48 million current US$ | 153.45 million current US$ | 959.22 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 520.25 million current US$ | 377.37 million current US$ | 1.08 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 434.49 million current US$ | 410.90 million current US$ | 476.84 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Least developed countries
- 7 Palestine, State of 29.31 million current US$ compare
- 8 Niger 27.77 million current US$ compare
- 9 Burundi 27.55 million current US$ compare
- 10 Senegal 24.06 million current US$ compare
- 11 Uganda 23.36 million current US$ compare
- 12 Guinea 19.99 million current US$ compare
- 13 Mali 19.35 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Least developed countries
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 92.13 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 410.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.35 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.75 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 649.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.12 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.96 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.48 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 381.23 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.39 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries was 410.90 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
- The highest recorded value was 1.08 billion current US$ in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
- The lowest recorded value was 72.57 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does Least developed countries rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Least developed countries ranks 10th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Least developed countries?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Least developed countries data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.