Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium square in Bolivia
Bolivia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium square was 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Bolivia, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Bolivia recorded 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.2% on the previous year and down 66.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Bolivia peaked at 55.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.0923 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Bolivia ranks 63rd of 149 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium square in Bolivia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 0.0923 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1968 | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1969 | 0.1846 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1970 | 0.1754 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1971 | 0.1754 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.1477 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1973 | 0.3046 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.2% |
| 1974 | 0.6277 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.1% |
| 1975 | 0.5077 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1976 | 0.7108 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1977 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +235.1% |
| 1978 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 1979 | 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 1980 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.6% |
| 1981 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.0% |
| 1982 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1983 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1984 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.2% |
| 1985 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1986 | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.9% |
| 1987 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1988 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 1989 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.8% |
| 1990 | 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.4% |
| 1991 | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.8% |
| 1992 | 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +345.0% |
| 1993 | 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.5% |
| 1994 | 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1995 | 42.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +564.6% |
| 1996 | 55.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.8% |
| 1997 | 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.7% |
| 1998 | 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +292.4% |
| 1999 | 11.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.3% |
| 2000 | 8.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 2001 | 8.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2002 | 17.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.3% |
| 2003 | 13.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 2004 | 15.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 2005 | 9.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.3% |
| 2006 | 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2007 | 13.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 2008 | 16.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2009 | 22.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 2010 | 19.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2011 | 21.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2012 | 15.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 2013 | 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 2014 | 17.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 2015 | 13.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 2016 | 19.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.2% |
| 2017 | 13.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 2018 | 10.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.8% |
| 2019 | 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2020 | 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2021 | 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2022 | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
| 2023 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
Bolivia compared with similar countries
- Bolivia's 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre, 1.8× the median. (45 countries reporting)
- Bolivia's 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre, 2.1× the median. (27 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium square in Bolivia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | +564.6% | 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.94 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1992 | +345.0% | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1998 | +292.4% | 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1339 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0923 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1846 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1970s | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1477 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 14.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
- 60 Hungary 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 61 Armenia 4.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 62 Iraq 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 64 Serbia 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Ethiopia 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 66 Equatorial Guinea 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bolivia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 593,566 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 12.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 33.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 229.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 21,193 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 15.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Bolivia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Bolivia was 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 55.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0923 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Bolivia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Bolivia ranks 63rd out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Bolivia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 66.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.