Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
14.36 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 41.8%
World rank
117th
of 171 countries
All-time high
92.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of is 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 41.8% on the previous year and up 12.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of peaked at 92.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 117th of 171 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0277 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0185 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0462 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0554 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1970 | 0.2031 current US$ per square kilometre | +266.7% |
| 1971 | 0.5354 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.6% |
| 1972 | 0.3323 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 1973 | 0.6739 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.8% |
| 1974 | 0.7662 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1975 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.5% |
| 1976 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1977 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +201.2% |
| 1978 | 13.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.1% |
| 1979 | 20.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.1% |
| 1980 | 17.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1981 | 28.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.8% |
| 1982 | 27.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1983 | 32.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1984 | 27.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 1985 | 20.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1986 | 21.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1987 | 49.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.2% |
| 1988 | 32.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 1989 | 85.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +162.9% |
| 1990 | 87.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1991 | 50.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 1992 | 80.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.1% |
| 1993 | 56.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 1994 | 74.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1995 | 86.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1996 | 90.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1997 | 60 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 1998 | 38.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1999 | 38.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 40.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2001 | 60.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.7% |
| 2002 | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.1% |
| 2003 | 29.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2004 | 46.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 2005 | 37.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2006 | 92.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +147.5% |
| 2007 | 34.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.2% |
| 2008 | 32.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2009 | 29.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2010 | 50.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.5% |
| 2011 | 36.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 2012 | 18.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.9% |
| 2013 | 12.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2014 | 13.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2015 | 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2016 | 10.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2017 | 9.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2018 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2019 | 20.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.2% |
| 2020 | 13.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.4% |
| 2021 | 21.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.8% |
| 2022 | 24.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2023 | 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0349 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2031 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 34.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 85.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 66.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 90.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 43.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 92.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- 114 Mauritania 18.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Kuwait 17.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Sudan 14.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Slovenia 13.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Trinidad and Tobago 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Mali 13.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 593,566 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 12.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 33.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 229.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 21,193 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 15.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of was 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The highest recorded value was 92.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 117th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia, Plurinational State of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.