Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Trinidad and Tobago, 1966–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Trinidad and Tobago recorded 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in 2010.
That represents a change of down 12.5% on the previous year and down 96.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 516.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002 and was at its lowest, 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 119th of 171 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1968 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1969 | 11.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +500.0% |
| 1970 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1971 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1972 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1973 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 9.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1975 | 15.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1976 | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1977 | 23.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.4% |
| 1978 | 21.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1979 | 37.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.7% |
| 1980 | 17.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.6% |
| 1981 | 27.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1982 | 40.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1983 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.7% |
| 1984 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1985 | 11.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1986 | 17.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1987 | 42.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +144.4% |
| 1988 | 58.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1989 | 163.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +180.0% |
| 1990 | 304.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.7% |
| 1991 | 175.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.3% |
| 1992 | 35.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1993 | 218.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +522.2% |
| 1994 | 436.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1995 | 243.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.2% |
| 1996 | 341.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1997 | 397.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1998 | 292.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 1999 | 452.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.7% |
| 2000 | 354.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 2001 | 228.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 2002 | 516.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.5% |
| 2003 | 434.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2004 | 370.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2005 | 384.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2006 | 259.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2007 | 15.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.0% |
| 2008 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 2009 | 15.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2010 | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1970s | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 38.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 163.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 289.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 452.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 258.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 516.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 116 Sudan 14.71 current US$ per square kilometre
- 117 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Slovenia 13.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Mali 13.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 121 Central African Republic 11.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Latvia 11.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2000)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 330,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 560,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 90,000 current US$ (1997)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 370,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 480,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 240,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 4.08 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Trinidad and Tobago was 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 516.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 119th out of 171 countries with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is down 96.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 45 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.