Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Brazil
Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 10.0%
World rank
114th
of 149 countries
All-time high
0.8459 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
All-time low
0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
59
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Brazil, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Brazil is 0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 10.0% on the previous year and down 80.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Brazil peaked at 0.8459 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Brazil ranks 114th of 149 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.2393 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0443 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0503 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1970 | 0.0407 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0395 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1972 | 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0718 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0718 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0909 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1977 | 0.1256 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 1978 | 0.1065 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1979 | 0.1316 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1980 | 0.1364 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1981 | 0.1196 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0969 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 1983 | 0.1711 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.5% |
| 1984 | 0.1304 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1985 | 0.1735 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 1986 | 0.1555 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1987 | 0.2082 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1988 | 0.2572 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1989 | 0.1567 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 1990 | 0.3482 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.1% |
| 1991 | 0.4044 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 1992 | 0.6365 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.4% |
| 1993 | 0.6317 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1994 | 0.5157 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.8459 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.0% |
| 1996 | 0.5946 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 1997 | 0.6293 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1998 | 0.5827 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1999 | 0.4403 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 2000 | 0.5611 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 2001 | 0.3254 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.0% |
| 2002 | 0.3494 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2003 | 0.4558 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2004 | 0.5719 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 2005 | 0.536 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2006 | 0.5252 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2007 | 0.591 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2008 | 0.4822 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2009 | 0.5001 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2010 | 0.4738 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2011 | 0.5336 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2012 | 0.4463 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2013 | 0.5683 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 2014 | 0.3446 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 2015 | 0.2895 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2016 | 0.2265 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2017 | 0.1379 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 2018 | 0.1517 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2019 | 0.1475 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.2371 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.7% |
| 2021 | 0.1766 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 2022 | 0.1021 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 2023 | 0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0811 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2393 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.0808 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1316 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1606 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0969 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2572 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.5629 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3482 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8459 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4898 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3254 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.591 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.332 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1379 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5683 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.157 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1021 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2371 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 111 Croatia 0.1787 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 112 Montenegro 0.1186 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 113 Vanuatu 0.1138 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Eswatini 0.1098 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Georgia 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 117 Republic of Korea 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Brazil?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Brazil was 0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8459 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0359 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Brazil ranks 114th out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 80.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.