Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
3.12 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 13.6%
Rank
26th
of 44 groups
All-time high
3.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
-0.1206 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1987
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia stood at 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.6% on the previous year and up 2,879.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.1206 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1987.
That places Europe & Central Asia 26th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.1169 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0548 current US$ per square kilometre | -146.9% |
| 1964 | 0.2375 current US$ per square kilometre | +333.3% |
| 1965 | 0.5845 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.2% |
| 1966 | 0.263 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 1967 | 0.4092 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1968 | 0.2302 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.7% |
| 1969 | 0.3361 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.0% |
| 1970 | 0.2777 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 1971 | 0.1973 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 1972 | 0.1955 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1973 | 0.2831 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.9% |
| 1974 | 0.4658 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.5% |
| 1975 | 0.5608 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1976 | 0.4987 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1977 | -0.0968 current US$ per square kilometre | -119.4% |
| 1978 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -1481.1% |
| 1979 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1980 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 1981 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 1982 | 0.011 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.2% |
| 1983 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +16866.8% |
| 1984 | 0.6723 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.9% |
| 1985 | 0.6668 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1986 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.3% |
| 1987 | -0.1206 current US$ per square kilometre | -110.7% |
| 1988 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -1283.3% |
| 1989 | 0.6669 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.3% |
| 1990 | 0.4696 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 1991 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.4% |
| 1992 | -0.0181 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.5% |
| 1993 | -0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | +416.1% |
| 1994 | 0.169 current US$ per square kilometre | -281.1% |
| 1995 | 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0184 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.9% |
| 1997 | 0.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +444.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0418 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.2% |
| 1999 | 0.4121 current US$ per square kilometre | +886.6% |
| 2000 | 0.3735 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2001 | 0.2923 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2002 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +511.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0435 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.6% |
| 2004 | 0.4237 current US$ per square kilometre | +873.1% |
| 2005 | 0.5158 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2006 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.3% |
| 2007 | -0.0751 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.3% |
| 2008 | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | -241.3% |
| 2009 | -0.1178 current US$ per square kilometre | -211.0% |
| 2010 | -0.1068 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2011 | -0.0879 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2012 | -0.0704 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 2013 | -0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.6% |
| 2014 | -0.0882 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2015 | 0.2158 current US$ per square kilometre | -344.6% |
| 2016 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +1096.2% |
| 2017 | 0.3676 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.8% |
| 2018 | 0.4617 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2019 | 0.4114 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2020 | 0.5233 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 2021 | 0.6583 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2022 | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +317.4% |
| 2023 | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.222 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1169 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5845 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4839 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0968 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9328 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1206 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2411 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4764 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1178 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3572 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5233 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 23 Malawi 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Samoa 31.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Singapore 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Ghana 22.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Mozambique 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Niger 21.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Guatemala 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia was 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.1206 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 26th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,879.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.