Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4.64 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 7.8%
Rank
22nd
of 44 groups
All-time high
11.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Middle income is 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 7.8% on the previous year and down 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Middle income peaked at 11.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Middle income ranks 22nd of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0174 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre | +306.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0621 current US$ per square kilometre | +177.7% |
| 1966 | 0.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1967 | 0.1536 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.4% |
| 1968 | 0.1952 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1969 | 0.2956 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.5% |
| 1970 | 0.3056 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1971 | 0.4703 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.9% |
| 1972 | 0.4344 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1973 | 0.9541 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.6% |
| 1974 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1975 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1976 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1977 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1978 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1979 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.2% |
| 1980 | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1981 | 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1982 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 1983 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1984 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1985 | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1986 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1987 | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 1988 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1989 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1990 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.3% |
| 1991 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.8% |
| 1992 | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1993 | 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1994 | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1995 | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1996 | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 1998 | 4.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 1999 | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.2% |
| 2000 | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2001 | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2002 | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.5% |
| 2003 | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.1% |
| 2004 | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 2005 | 11.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.5% |
| 2006 | 9.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 2007 | 5.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.0% |
| 2008 | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.5% |
| 2009 | 6.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2010 | 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2011 | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2012 | 8.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.5% |
| 2013 | 4.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.1% |
| 2014 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2015 | 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2016 | 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 2017 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 2018 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2019 | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2020 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2021 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2022 | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2023 | 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0913 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2956 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3056 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 19 Barbados 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Mauritius 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Sierra Leone 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Oman 40.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Malawi 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Samoa 31.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Singapore 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Middle income was 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 11.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Middle income ranks 22nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.