Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 19.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
19.28 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.3%
Rank
5th
of 44 groups
All-time high
55.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
3.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) stood at 19.28 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 1.3% on the previous year and down 18.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) peaked at 55.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 5th of 44 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1963 | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1964 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1965 | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1966 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 1967 | 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1968 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1969 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1970 | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1971 | 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1972 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1973 | 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1974 | 7.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1975 | 8.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1976 | 7.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1977 | 8.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1978 | 10.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1979 | 13.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1980 | 14.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1981 | 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1982 | 9.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1983 | 8.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1984 | 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1985 | 9.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1986 | 12.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 1987 | 14.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1988 | 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 10.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 1990 | 15.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 1991 | 10.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 1992 | 12.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1993 | 10.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1994 | 9.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1995 | 9.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1996 | 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1997 | 10.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1998 | 12.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 1999 | 7.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 2000 | 9.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 2001 | 11.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2002 | 16.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.3% |
| 2003 | 48.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +189.4% |
| 2004 | 24.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.1% |
| 2005 | 27.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2006 | 38.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.1% |
| 2007 | 29.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.0% |
| 2008 | 28.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2009 | 35.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 2010 | 55.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 2011 | 36.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 2012 | 31.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2013 | 23.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 2014 | 21.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2015 | 17.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2016 | 18.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2017 | 18.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 18.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2020 | 18.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2021 | 21.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2022 | 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2023 | 19.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 7.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 10.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 26.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 25.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 19.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- 2 Rwanda 1,553 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Sao Tome and Principe 1,469 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Burundi 1,073 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Lebanon 898.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Benin 263.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Dominica 254.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Syrian Arab Republic 171.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) was 19.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 55.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 5th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.