Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Türkiye
Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
10.42 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 31.1%
World rank
44th
of 149 countries
All-time high
85.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
-7.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Years of data
62
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Türkiye, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Türkiye stood at 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 31.1% on the previous year and up 336.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Türkiye peaked at 85.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, -7.9 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2008.
That places Türkiye 44th out of 149 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Türkiye, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | -0.8316 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.3898 current US$ per square kilometre | -146.9% |
| 1964 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +333.3% |
| 1965 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.2% |
| 1966 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 1967 | 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1968 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.8% |
| 1969 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 1970 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1971 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 1972 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1973 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1974 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.3% |
| 1975 | 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 1976 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1977 | -0.7536 current US$ per square kilometre | -122.8% |
| 1978 | 9.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -1360.3% |
| 1979 | 7.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1980 | 12.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.2% |
| 1981 | 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1982 | 0.078 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.2% |
| 1983 | 13.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +16866.6% |
| 1984 | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.9% |
| 1985 | 4.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1986 | 7.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.6% |
| 1987 | -1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -112.8% |
| 1988 | 10.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -1098.7% |
| 1989 | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.3% |
| 1990 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 1991 | 8.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +155.7% |
| 1992 | -3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -142.5% |
| 1993 | -3.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1994 | -3.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1995 | 0.2988 current US$ per square kilometre | -107.7% |
| 1996 | -5.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -2069.6% |
| 1997 | -5.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1998 | -6.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1999 | -4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2000 | -0.2209 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.5% |
| 2001 | -5.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +2447.1% |
| 2002 | -7 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 2003 | -5.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 2004 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -185.3% |
| 2005 | 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.2% |
| 2006 | 12.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.1% |
| 2007 | -7.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -162.8% |
| 2008 | -7.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2009 | -7.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2010 | -6.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2011 | -6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2012 | -4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2013 | -4.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2014 | -3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 2015 | 4.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -212.9% |
| 2016 | 85.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +1835.8% |
| 2017 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.0% |
| 2018 | 11.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 2019 | 10.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2020 | 11.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2021 | 17.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 2022 | 15.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2023 | 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8316 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7536 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | -2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 85.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 13.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Türkiye
- 41 Cyprus 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Philippines 11.88 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Tanzania, United Republic of 10.88 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Azerbaijan 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Bulgaria 8.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Czechia 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Türkiye
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 35.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 8.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 22.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 633.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 38.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 31.67 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Türkiye?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Türkiye was 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Türkiye?
- The highest recorded value was 85.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Türkiye?
- The lowest recorded value was -7.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- How does Türkiye rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Türkiye ranks 44th out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Türkiye?
- Over the last ten years it is up 336.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Türkiye data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.